Friday, May 18, 2012

You are here: Home > New York Jets > Rate the Jets chances of winning against the Steelers

Rate the Jets chances of winning against the Steelers

by Payday on December 18, 2010

in New York Jets

We need this a few times tomorrow

Watching the Jets lose two in a row is about as fun as a colonoscopy. Granted I’m 20 and I’ve never had one before, I assume they suck. Watching the Jets lose three in a row might be the equivalent of a colonoscopy and a root canal. With that being said, in your heart of hearts, what do you rate the Jets chances of winning against the Steelers are? Take the poll below and let the Jersey Jets Fan know what you’re thinking.

Personally, I’ll give the Jets a 6 (or 60% chance of winning for those not mathematically inclined), that is if Troy Polamalu does not play. If he does play, then I got my money on a long haired bastard picking off Sanchez at least once. The Jets know they need to win this game. You know it, I know it, even my unborn child knows it. The Jets have to win this game, or at least show some signs of life to prevent the flood gates from breaking open. Win and we’re golden, lose and… well.. we’re screwed.

So what do you think? Vote below and leave a comment too.

Rate the Jets chances of winning. 1-10 (1 definite loss, 10 definite win)

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Want more Jets news?
If so, join countless other New York Jets fans who subscribe to the Jersey Jets Fan newsletter. We hold FREE t-shirt giveaways, fantasy sport leagues, important news and more.

This post was written by...

– who has written 561 posts on Jersey Jets Fan- a New York Jets Blog with Attitude.

Rob aka Payday is the founder of the Jersey Jets Fan and BROcrastinator. Rob is a 21 year old college student that has been a New York Jets fan for all his life, as well as a Qdoba burrito eating enthusiast, military history junkie and proud resident of New Jersey. Follow Rob on Twitter @JerseyJetsFan and Facebook

Contact the author

Leave a Comment

*

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: